4.3 Article

A new hybrid scaffold using rapid prototyping and electrohydrodynamic direct writing for bone tissue regeneration

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY
卷 21, 期 47, 页码 19138-19143

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1jm13712c

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea [A084589]
  2. Ministry of Education, Science Technology (MEST)
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  4. Korea Health Promotion Institute [A084589] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-04-대-05-016] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomedical scaffolds have been widely used to regenerate various tissues and organs. One technology used for scaffold fabrication is rapid prototyping (RP), which has the advantage of easy control of the internal microstructure of scaffolds. However, scaffolds fabricated using RP technology show low resolution of struts and too smooth struts, which can deteriorate initial cell attachment and proliferation. To overcome this problem, we propose a hybrid technology combining a RP system and electrohydrodynamic (EHD) direct writing, which has been used to generate highly roughened microsized threads for enhanced cellular behavior with controllable mechanical properties. The resulting structure consists of alternating layers of microsized struts and highly roughened threads. The results of culturing osteoblast-like cells show significantly enhanced biological properties of the scaffold (approximately 2 times the cell viability and 2.5 times the bone mineralization) compared to the scaffolds fabricated using RP technology, and we believe that the combined process can be a promising method for fabricating three-dimensional biomedical scaffolds in soft and hard tissue regeneration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据