4.4 Article

Identification and characterization of new Fusarium masked mycotoxins, T2 and HT2 glycosyl derivatives, in naturally contaminated wheat and oats by liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 47, 期 4, 页码 466-475

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jms.2980

关键词

T-2 toxin; HT-2 toxin; masked mycotoxins; cereals; high-resolution mass spectrometry

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Economy and Finance [191/2009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of glucoside derivatives of T-2 and HT-2 toxins (type A trichothecene mycotoxins) in naturally contaminated wheat and oats is reported for the first time. The use of advanced high-resolution mass spectrometry based on Orbitrap technology allowed to obtain molecular structure details by measuring exact masses of main characteristic fragments, with mass accuracy lower than 2.8?ppm (absolute value). A monoglucoside derivative of T-2 toxin and two monoglucoside derivatives of HT-2 toxin were identified and characterized. The analysis of their fragmentation patterns provided evidence for glucosylation at C-3 position for T-2 toxin and at C-3 or C-4 position for HT-2 toxin. A screening for the presence of these new masked forms of mycotoxins was carried out on a set of naturally contaminated wheat and oats samples. On the basis of peak area ratio between glucoside derivatives and free T-2 and HT-2 toxins, the presence of glucoside derivatives was more likely in wheat than in oats samples. The present work confirms the widespread occurrence of trichothecene glucosides in cereal grains naturally contaminated with the relevant unconjugated toxins, thus suggesting the importance of developing suitable analytical methods for their detection. Besides toxicity studies, tracking down these new masked forms of trichothecenes along the food/feed chain would enable to collect information on their relevance in human/animal exposure to mycotoxin risk. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据