4.2 Article

Why do female prairie dogs copulate with more than one male?-Insights from long-term research

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY
卷 94, 期 4, 页码 731-744

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1644/12-MAMM-A-291.1

关键词

Cynomys; genetic diversity; polyandry; prairie dog; reproductive success; survivorship

类别

资金

  1. Colorado Parks and Wildlife
  2. Denver Zoological Park
  3. Environmental Defense
  4. Eppley Foundation
  5. Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation
  6. National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
  7. National Geographic Society
  8. National Science Foundation
  9. Princeton University
  10. Ted Turner Foundation
  11. University of Michigan
  12. University of Minnesota
  13. University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A female usually obtains sufficient sperm to fertilize all her, eggs from a single insemination, and mating can be costly. Yet, paradoxically, polyandry (i.e., copulation with 2 or more males) is common among organisms of all types, from amoebae through humans. Research that spanned 35 years shows that females of 3 species of prairie dogs benefited from polyandry by rearing more yearlings (a component of fitness that is my best estimate of female reproductive success); females of a 4th species (the black-tailed prairie dog [Cynomys ludovicianus]) evidently did not benefit from polyandry. Reasons for the higher production of yearlings by polyandrous females differed among species. For Gunnison's prairie dogs (C. gunnisoni), 3 other components of fitness contributed to the higher production of yearlings: a higher probability of conception and parturition, larger litter size at weaning, and a higher survivorship of offspring during the first 9 months after weaning. The 2nd and 3rd components applied to Utah prairie dogs (C. parvidens), but only the 1st component applied to white-tailed prairie dogs (C. leucurus). Female Gunnison's and white-tailed prairie dogs paid a cost from copulating with more than 1 male, because they were less likely to survive until the next mating season.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据