4.2 Article

Patterns of phenotypic and genetic variation in three species of endemic Mesoamerican Peromyscus (Rodentia: Cricetidae)

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY
卷 91, 期 4, 页码 848-859

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1644/09-MAMM-A-167.1

关键词

cytochrome b; morphometrics; Peromyscus; Peromyscus mexicanus species group

类别

资金

  1. Department of Biological Sciences at San Jose State University
  2. Virginia Community College system professional development grant
  3. Northern Virginia Community College educational foundation
  4. Association of Biologists of the Department of Biological Sciences at Texas Tech University
  5. Fulbright scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three species of Mexican deer mice of the Peromyscus mexicanus species group (P. grandis, P. guatemalensis, and P. zarhynchus) were characterized morphologically and genetically to test hypothesized concepts of species limits. We investigated if previously proposed phenetic relationships among these 3 taxa were supported by morphometric and genetic data. Analyses of nongeographic and geographic variation for individuals from 36 localities in Guatemala and southeastern Mexico were conducted to assay morphologic and geographic boundaries. In addition, 35 mitochondrial cytochrome-b gene sequences were analyzed using maximum-parsimony and Bayesian inference methods to determine relationships among the 3 taxa. This study based on comparisons to type specimens provided support for the presence of 3 morphologically and genetically distinct units. Our analyses suggest that P. grandis and P. guatemalensis are more closely related to each other than either is to P. zarhynchus, rejecting existing hypotheses that suggest that P. zarhynchu.s- and P. grandis are phenetically more similar. The results of this study depict relationships among other members of the P. mexicanus group and patterns of speciation and biogeography and allow identification of regionally important phylogeographic units in Mesoamerica. DOI: 10.1644/09-MAMM-A-167.1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据