4.2 Article

SPECIATION WITHIN BONNETED BATS (GENUS EUMOPS): THE COMPLEXITY OF MORPHOLOGICAL, MITOCHONDRIAL, AND NUCLEAR DATA SETS IN SYSTEMATICS

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY
卷 89, 期 5, 页码 1306-1315

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1644/07-MAMM-A-349.1

关键词

amplified fragment length polymorphism; bonneted bat; cytochrome b; Eumops floridanus; Eumops glaucinus; Genetic Species Concept; karyotype; Molossidae

类别

资金

  1. Angelo State University
  2. Southwestern Association of Naturalists
  3. Texas Academy of Science
  4. Texas Tech University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We phylogenetically analyze 705 base pairs of the cytochrome-b gene and 351 amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) bands from populations of the karyotypically variable Wagner's bonneted bat, Eumops glaucimus, and the Florida bonneted bat, Eumops floridanus (Chiroptera: Molossidae). Three karyotypes have been documented across the range of E. glancinus, and we report that the karyotype from Cuba is morphologically similar to that from Jamaica. A 4th karyotype is present in specimens from western Ecuador. Three distinct lineages are present in both the cytochrome-h and AFLP trees. One lineage is restricted to western Ecuador and exhibits cytochrome-b divergence values comparable to the values seen between recognized species of eumops, suggesting that this lineage represents a distinct species. The other 2 lineages are distributed in disjunct areas: Paraguay and Venezuela and Mexico, the Caribbean. and the United States. Specimens of E. floridanus are morphologically distinct from E. glaucinus, but cannot be distinguished by examination of cytochrome-b or AFLP DNA data. We conclude that there are 4 species in the E. glaucinus complex-E. E. glaucinus (South America east of the Andes), E. ferox (Caribbean, Mexico, and Central America), E.floridamus in south Florida, and an unnamed taxon in western Ecuador. Speciation is a complex process and no single mechanism, model, concept, or definition is likely to cover all the diverse patterns observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据