4.7 Article

Assessment of the accuracy of MRI wall shear stress estimation using numerical simulations

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 128-138

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23610

关键词

wall shear stress; phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging; atherosclerosis; hemodynamics; Fourier velocity encoding; numerical simulations

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation
  3. Center for Industrial Information Technology (CENIIT)
  4. Swedish Brain Foundation
  5. Fulbright Commission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To investigate the accuracy of wall shear stress (WSS) estimation using MRI. Specifically, to investigate the impact of different parameters and if MRI WSS estimates are monotonically related to actual WSS. Materials and Methods: The accuracy of WSS estimation using methods based on phase-contrast (PC) MRI velocity mapping, Fourier velocity encoding (FVE) and intravoxel velocity standard deviation mapping were studied using numerical simulations. The influence of spatial resolution, velocity encoding, wall segmentation, and voxel location were investigated over a range of WSS values. Results: WSS estimates were found to be sensitive to parameter settings in general and spatial resolution in particular. All methods underestimated WSS, except for the FVE-based method, which instead was extremely sensitive to voxel position relative to the wall. Methods using PC-based WSS estimation with wall segmentation showed to be accurate for low WSS, but were sensitive to segmentation errors. Conclusion: Even in the absence of noise and for relatively simple velocity profiles, MRI WSS estimates cannot always be assumed to be linearly or even monotonically related to actual WSS. High WSS values cannot be resolved and the estimates depend on parameter setting. Nevertheless, distinguishing areas of low and moderate WSS may be feasible. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2012;36:128138. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据