4.7 Article

Measuring Perfusion and Permeability in Renal Cell Carcinoma With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: A Pilot Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 31, 期 2, 页码 490-501

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22028

关键词

RCC; DCE-MRI; neoadjuvant antiangiogenic therapy; perfusion; two-compartment-model; tumor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To retrospectively assess an improved quantitative methodology with separate assessment of perfusion and permeability for characterization of primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and monitoring antiangiogenic treatment. Materials and Methods: Fifteen RCC patients before surgery, 6 RCC patients before and after neoadjuvant antiangiogenic therapy, and 15 patients without renal disease underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI of the kidney with integrated retrospective respiratory triggering and an individual arterial input function. Tracer kinetic analysis was performed with a two-compartment-filtration-model for the kidney data and a two-compartment-exchange-model for the tumor data, providing four independent parameters: the perfusion-parameters, plasma flow (F-P) and plasma volume (V-P), and the permeability-parameters extraction flow (F-E) and extravascular-extracellular volume (V-E). Results: In tumors F-P and F-E were significantly lower than in normal kidneys. Tracer kinetic analysis displayed hemodynamic alteration caused by vessel infiltration or necrosis. Papillary RCC could be differentiated from clear-cell variants by a distinct perfusion pattern. In antiangiogenically treated RCC V-E was not significantly decreased, while the perfusion parameters V-P and F-P were significantly diminished. Conclusion: DCE-MRI with integrated motion compensation enables evaluation of primary RCC and detects distinct perfusion patterns. Quantification with a two-compartment-exchange-model produces a separate perfusion- and permeability characterization and may become a diagnostic tool to monitor antiangiogenic treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据