4.3 Article

Low-temperature dynamic nuclear polarization at 9.4 T with a 30 mW microwave source

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE
卷 204, 期 2, 页码 303-313

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2010.03.016

关键词

Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance; Sensitivity enhancement; Hyperpolarization; Nitroxide; TEMPO; Spin lattice relaxation; Paramagnetic relaxation

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health
  2. NIH Intramural AIDS Targeted Antiviral Program
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [ZIADK029029] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) can provide large signal enhancements in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) by transfer of polarization from electron spins to nuclear spins. We discuss several aspects of DNP experiments at 9.4 T (400 MHz resonant frequency for H-1, 264 GHz for electron spins in organic radicals) in the 7-80 K temperature range, using a 30 mW, frequency-tunable microwave source and a quasi-optical microwave bridge for polarization control and low-loss microwave transmission. In experiments on frozen glycerol/water doped with nitroxide radicals, DNP signal enhancements up to a factor of 80 are observed (relative to 1H NMR signals with thermal equilibrium spin polarization). The largest sensitivity enhancements are observed with a new triradical dopant, DOTOPA-TEMPO. Field modulation with a 10 G root-mean-squared amplitude during DNP increases the nuclear spin polarizations by up to 135%. Dependencies of 1H NMR signal amplitudes, nuclear spin relaxation times, and DNP build-up times on the dopant and its concentration, temperature, microwave power, and modulation frequency are reported and discussed. The benefits of low-temperature DNP can be dramatic: the H spin polarization is increased approximately 1000-fold at 7 K with DNP, relative to thermal polarization at 80 k. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据