4.3 Article

Enhancement of Flame Retardant Performance of Bio-Based Polylactic Acid Composites with the Incorporation of Aluminum Hypophosphite and Expanded Graphite

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10601325.2013.742835

关键词

Polylactic acid; flame retardant; aluminum hypophosphite; expanded graphite; polymer-matrix composites

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB719701]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11125210]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2320000014]
  4. Guangdong province [2010A090100017]
  5. CAS [2010A090100017]
  6. State Key Laboratory of Fire Science of USTC [HZ2010-KF06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of flame retarding biodegradable polylactic acid composites (FR-PLA) based on aluminum hypophosphite (AHP) and expanded graphite (EG) were prepared by the melt-compounding method. The effect of AHP and EG on the flame retardancy and thermal stability of PLA were investigated by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), UL-94 vertical burning test, limiting oxygen index, microscale combustion calorimetry and cone calorimeter testing. The gas products of PLA and FR-PLA composites were investigated by TG-IR technology. TGA results showed that the FR-PLA composites presented higher char residue and reduced mass loss rate than neat PLA. Significant improvement of flame retardancy of PLA/AHP/EG composites indicated an excellent synergistic effect between AHP and EG. Cone calorimeter tests gave clear evidence that the combination of AHP and EG resulted in a significant reduction of the heat release rate (HRR) and total heat release (THR). TG-IR revealed that the combination of AHP and EG resulted in significant decrease of gas products. The char residue of FR-PLA composites were also investigated by scanning electron microscope, Fourier transform infrared spectra spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Based on the analysis, possible flame retardant mechanism was discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据