4.2 Article

AN ETHOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION OF ZOOPHYCOS BASED ON PERMIAN RECORDS FROM SOUTH CHINA AND SOUTHEASTERN AUSTRALIA

期刊

PALAIOS
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 408-423

出版社

SEPM-SOC SEDIMENTARY GEOLOGY
DOI: 10.2110/palo.2013.060

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [41072252, 41472001, 41290260]
  2. 111 project
  3. 973 project [B08030, 2011CB808800]
  4. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20120145110012, 20134116120002]
  5. Australian Research Council [ARC DP150100690]
  6. Deakin University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Abundant, well-preserved Zoophycos is common in the lower and middle Permian paleotropical neritic limestone of South China and in the middle Permian glaciomarine lithic wackestone of southeastern Australia. Zoophycos from both regions is composed of a marginal tube and a tongue-like spreiten complex, the latter itself consisting of primary lamellae in planar view and backfill structures (dark and light menisci) in cross-sectional view. The Zoophycos tracemaker is interpreted to have periodically collected and fed on the surrounding nutrient-enriched sediments within a shallow depth of the seafloor. The dark menisci may correspond to the burrowing phase, whereas the light menisci may be related to a multiple-behavior phase, including dwelling, feeding, farming, resting, and excreting. Symbiotic microorganisms (e.g., sulphate-reducing bacteria) may have been closely involved with the Zoophycos tracemaker in producing the complex structures of the spreiten, based on the abundant pyrite framboids that were found in the Zoophycos spreiten. We suggest that Zoophycos is not simply a biogenic sedimentary structure formed by the motion of the tracemaker; rather it represents a set of complex and elaborate biogenic structures formed by a succession of life behaviors of the tracemaker along with its symbiotic microorganisms. The complete formative process of Zoophycos is reconstructed and linked to its morphology, based on this interpretation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据