4.6 Article

Protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase and glycogen synthase kinase-3α/β regulate foam cell formation

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 55, 期 11, 页码 2320-2333

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M051094

关键词

endoplasmic reticulum; macrophages; atherosclerosis; signal transduction; protein kinases; PERK; endoplasmic reticulum stress

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes for Health Research
  2. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario [000031]
  3. Canadian Institutes for Health Research [MOP62910, MOP133612]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evidence suggests a causative role for endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in the development of atherosclerosis. This study investigated the potential role of glycogen synthase kinase (GSK)-3 alpha/beta in proatherogenic ER stress signaling. Thp1-derived macrophages were treated with the ER stress-inducing agents, glucosamine, thapsigargin, or palmitate. Using small-molecule inhibitors of specific unfolded protein response (UPR) signaling pathways, we found that protein kinase R-like ER kinase (PERK), but not inositol requiring enzyme 1 or activating transcription factor 6, is required for the activation of GSK3 alpha/beta by ER stress. GSK3 alpha/beta inhibition or siRNA-directed knockdown attenuated ER stress-induced expression of distal components of the PERK pathway. Macrophage foam cells within atherosclerotic plaques and isolated macrophages from ApoE(-/-) mice fed a diet supplemented with the GSK3 alpha/beta inhibitor valproate had reduced levels of C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP). GSK3 alpha/beta inhibition blocked ER stress-induced lipid accumulation and the upregulation of genes associated with lipid metabolism. In primary mouse macrophages, PERK inhibition blocked ER stress-induced lipid accumulation, whereas constitutively active S9A-GSK3 beta promoted foam cell formation and CHOP expression, even in cells treated with a PERK inhibitor. These findings suggest that ER stress-PERK-GSK3 alpha/beta signaling promotes proatherogenic macrophage lipid accumulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据