4.6 Article

Glucosylceramide synthase in the fat body controls energy metabolism in Drosophila

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 52, 期 7, 页码 1392-1399

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M014266

关键词

glycosphingolipid; ceramide; P38 mitogen-activated protein kinase; activating transcription factor 2; adipocyte

资金

  1. Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) of the Japan Science Technology Agency (JST)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucosylceramide synthase (GlcT-1) catalyzes the synthesis of glucosylceramide (GlcCer), the core structure of major glycosphingolipids (GSLs). Obesity is a metabolic disorder caused by an imbalance between energy uptake and expenditure, resulting in excess stored body fat. Recent studies have shown that GSL levels are increased in obese rodents and that pharmacologically reducing GSL levels by inhibiting GlcCer synthesis improves adipocyte function. However, the molecular mechanism underlying these processes is still not clearly understood. Using Drosophila as a model animal, we report that GlcT-1 expression in the fat body, which is equivalent to mammalian adipose tissue, regulates energy metabolism. Overexpression of GlcT-1 increases stored nutrition (triacylglycerol and carbohydrate) levels. Conversely, reduced expression of GlcT-1 in the fat body causes a reduction of fat storage. This regulation occurs, at least in part, through the activation of p38-ATF2 signaling. Furthermore, we found that GlcCer is the sole GSL of the fat body, indicating that regulation of GlcCer synthesis by GlcT-1 in the fat body is responsible for regulating energy homeostasis. Both GlcT-1 and p38-ATF2 signaling are evolutionarily conserved, leading us to propose an evolutionary perspective in which GlcT-1 appears to be one of the key factors that control fat metabolism.-Kohyama-Koganeya, A., T. Nabetani, M. Miura, and Y. Hirabayashi. Glucosylceramide synthase in the fat body controls energy metabolism in Drosophila. J. Lipid Res. 2011. 52: 1392-1399.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据