4.7 Article

Late Pennsylvanian aridification on the southwestern margin of Gondwana (Paganzo Basin, NW Argentina): A regional expression of a global climate perturbation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2014.10.029

关键词

Paleosol; Pennsylvanian; Paleoclimate; Late Paleozoic; Ice age; Gondwana

资金

  1. NSF [EAR-0545654, OISE-0826105, EAR-1024737, ANT-1142792]
  2. Division Of Earth Sciences
  3. Directorate For Geosciences [1024737] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Paleosols of the Paganzo Group preserve a shift from the cool climate of the glaciated high-latitudes of Gondwana to a long-term aridification punctuated by shorter-term fluctuations in moisture regime in the late Carboniferous. A quantitative reconstruction of paleoclimate inferred from the major element chemistry of paleosol horizons and the stable isotope geochemistry of soil-formed minerals and organic matter indicates that the climate varied substantially during deglaciation along the southwestern margin of Gondwana in the Middle Pennsylvanian including two geologically abrupt shifts to notably drier conditions. This dynamic climate terminates in a dry subhumid moisture regime characterized by steppe/dry scrub floral provinces. Quantitative estimates of net primary production during the post-glacial interval inferred from paleosol major element geochemistry are consistent with a mesic soil temperature regime, in agreement with paleotemperatures inferred from pedogenic goethite delta D and delta O-18. Contemporaneous aridification is well expressed in paleotropical continental records with Middle to Late Pennsylvanian acidification coincident with an abrupt evolutionary change in many marine and terrestrial species. The synchrony of aridification between the high and low paleo-latitudes and concomitant major restructuring of some ecosystems suggests that a paleoclimate change of global nature occurred during the Moscovian and Kasimovian. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据