4.6 Article

Caveolin-1-dependent and -independent membrane domains

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 50, 期 8, 页码 1609-1620

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M800601-JLR200

关键词

lipid rafts; caveolae; lipid profile

资金

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council
  3. Australian National Heart Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lipid rafts defined as cholesterol-and sphingomyelin-rich domains have been isolated from different cell types that vary greatly in their lipid profiles. Here, we investigated the contribution of the structural protein caveolin-1 (Cav1) to the overall lipid composition and domain abundance in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) from wildtype (WT) or Cav1-deficient (Cav1(-/-)) animals. Our findings show that Cav1 expression had no effect on free (membrane-associated) cholesterol levels. However, Cav1(-/-) deficient cells did have a higher proportion of sphingomyelin, decreased abundance of unsaturated phospholipids, and a trend toward shorter fatty acid chains in phosphatidylcholine. We isolated detergent-resistant membranes (DRMs), nondetergent raft domains (NDR), and cholesterol oxidase (CO)-sensitive domains and assessed the abundance of ordered domains in intact cells using the fluorescent dye Laurdan. Despite differences in phospholipid composition, we found that cholesterol levels in DRMs, NDR, and CO-sensitive domains were similar in both cell types. The data suggest that Cav1 is not required to target cholesterol to lipid rafts and that CO does not specifically oxidize caveolar cholesterol. In contrast, the abundance of ordered domains in adherent cells is reduced in Cav1(-/-) compared with WT MEFs, suggesting that cell architecture is critical in maintaining Cav1-induced lipid rafts.-Lay, S. L., Q. Li, N. Proschogo, M. Rodriguez, K. Gunaratnam, S. Cartland, C. Rentero, W. Jessep, T. Mitchell, and K. Gaus. Caveolin-1-dependent and -independent membrane domains. J. Lipid Res. 2009. 50: 1609-1620.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据