4.6 Article

Expression of CETP and of splice variants induces the same level of ER stress despite secretion efficiency differences

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 9, 页码 1955-1962

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.M800078-JLR200

关键词

HDL-cholesterol; atherosclerosis; Alu sequence; endoplasmic reticulum; cholesteryl ester transfer protein

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) gene has been associated with a variety of phenotypes, including HDL-cholesterol levels and, more sporadically, with cardiovascular disease, obesity, and extreme longevity. Alterations of CETP activity levels can be caused by single-base polymorphisms as well as by alternative splicing. In addition to the previously characterized alternative splicing that skips exon 9, we found additional minor variants and characterized the activity of the resultant proteins. The novel variants skipped exon 9 sequences and inserted one of two in-frame exons from Alu-derived intronic sequences. None of the alternatively spliced variants are efficiently secreted, and co-expression of them inhibits wild-type CETP secretion. Expression of the alternative spliced variants causes an induction of genes linked to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response, including the neighboring HERPUD1 (homocysteine- and ER stress-inducible protein, ubiquitin- like domain-containing) gene. Unexpectedly, even though wild-type CETP is secreted much more efficiently than spliced variants, it induces the same degree of stress response as spliced variants, whereas a control secreted protein does not. CETP plays a complex role in modulating ER stress, with its expression inducing the response and its cholesteryl ester transfer activity and differential splicing modulating the response in other ways.-Lira, M. E., A. K. Loomis, S. A. Paciga, D. B. Lloyd, and J. F. Thompson. Expression of CETP and of splice variants induces the same level of ER stress despite secretion efficiency differences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据