4.1 Article

Spatial distribution of fish assemblages along environmental gradients in the temporary ponds of Northern Pantanal, Brazil

期刊

JOURNAL OF LIMNOLOGY
卷 72, 期 1, 页码 95-102

出版社

PAGEPRESS PUBL
DOI: 10.4081/jlimnol.2013.e8

关键词

pond depth; macrophyte; niche theory; neutral theory; spatial analysis; floodplain

资金

  1. Graduate Program in Ecology and Conservation of Biodiversity (UFMT)
  2. National Council to Scientific and Technologic Development (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ten temporary ponds in Northern Pantanal were studied in July 2006 to explore whether a spatial distribution pattern existed in the composition of fish assemblages, and to identify which environmental variables determined their distribution. The existence of any spatial pattern was tested using the multivariate Mantel correlogram, while the influence of environmental variables was quantified by a Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA). A total of 8735 individuals was sampled from 29 species, predominantly represented by Hyphessobrycon elachys and Serrapinnus calliurus. Composition of fish assemblages varied among ponds, but this variation had no significant spatial pattern for any of the distance classes considered, thus indicating that the species composition varied independently of the distance between ponds. This suggests that stochastic dispersal processes did not influence the spatial structure of species, as predicted by the neutral theory. Conversely, species composition in the ponds was determined by variables that included depth, macrophyte richness and cover. Species such as Markiana nigripinnis, Crenicichla vittata and Moenkhausia sanctaefilomenae occurred in deeper waters, while Parauchenipterus striatulus, Eigenmannia trilineata and Psellogrammus kennedyi were mainly associated with greater richness and macrophyte cover, as already demonstrated by the niche theory applied in ponds which tended to have similar characteristics and a similar fish composition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据