4.5 Article

Prevalence, intensity, and aneuploidy patterns of disseminated neoplasia in cockles (Cerastoderrna edule) from Arcachon Bay: Seasonal variation and position in sediment

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVERTEBRATE PATHOLOGY
卷 104, 期 2, 页码 110-118

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jip.2010.01.011

关键词

Cerastoderma edule; Disseminated neoplasia; Seasonal survey; Flow cytometry; Histology; DNA content

类别

资金

  1. Region Bretagne
  2. French National Research Agency (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present report presents the first evidence of disseminated neoplasia (DN) in cockles Cerastoderma edule from Arcachon Bay (France). Aneuploidy of neoplastic cells allowed the use of flow cytometry (FCM) to diagnose and stage DN. A 1 year survey (2007) of the prevalence and intensity (% of aneuploid circulating cells in neoplastic cockles) was conducted. Prevalences ranged from 2.2% (June) to 13.6% (May), and disease intensity ranged from 18.7% (June) to 95.5% (September). These percentages were not correlated with seawater temperature, but rather showed unexplained oscillations over the year. Prevalence and intensity of DN were higher in cockles found at the surface of sediment compared to those buried normally (11.8% vs. 6.7% and 53.0% vs. 40.6%, respectively, p < 0.05). DN could thus be one mechanism leading to unexplained presence of cockles at the surface of the sediment in Arcachon Bay. Ploidy characteristics of neoplastic cells were also investigated using FCM, revealing an unusual, broad continuum of ploidy distribution from 1.6 to 9.6n. Ploidy values were not in whole numbers in contrast to the rounded values reported in other studies. Ploidy varied according to DN intensity, with the ploidy distribution of neoplastic cells from lightly-diseased cockles being unimodal (3.7n median). In contrast, highly-diseased cockles showed a bimodal ploidy distribution (3.0n and 4.7n medians). This suggests that, in cockles from Arcachon Bay, mechanisms leading to aneuploidy are complex, developing during disease progression. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据