4.3 Article

Prevention of postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease: Tripterygium wilfordii polyglycoside versus mesalazine

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 1, 页码 176-187

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0300060512474744

关键词

Crohn's disease; Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI); mesalazine; polyglycoside of Tripterygium wilfordii; postoperative recurrence; Rutgeerts' score

资金

  1. Climb Program of the Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Scholars, Jiangsu, China [BK2010017]
  2. Advanced Training Program for Research Talents of Jiangsu Province, China [BRA2011232]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To explore effectiveness and safety of polyglycosides of Tripterygium wilfordii (GTW) and mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid [5-ASA]) in preventing postoperative clinical and endoscopic recurrence of Crohn's disease. Methods: In this prospective, single-centre, single-blind study, postoperative Crohn's disease patients in remission were randomized to receive 1 mg/kg GTW daily, orally, or 4 g 5-ASA daily, orally, for 52 weeks. Patients underwent physical examinations, ileocolonoscopies and biochemical analyses at baseline and weeks 13, 26 and 52, or when clinical recurrence was suspected. Outcome measures were proportion of patients showing clinical or endoscopic recurrence at week 52, and changes in Rutgeerts' and Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) scores. Results: Twenty-one patients were assigned to receive GTW and 18 to 5-ASA; two patients on GTW and one on 5-ASA were withdrawn. Clinical and endoscopic recurrences were less common in the GTW group (n = 4) versus the 5-ASA group (n = 9). There were improvements in Rutgeerts' scores for those taking GTW. Mean between-group CDAI scores were similar. No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion: These findings indicate that GTW appears to be an effective, well-tolerated prophylactic regimen, superior to oral 5-ASA, for preventing clinical and endoscopic recurrence in postsurgical Crohn's disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据