4.3 Article

Pilot Study: Effects of Parenteral Glutamine Dipeptide Supplementation on Neutrophil Functions and Prevention of Chemotherapy-induced Side-effects in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 1383-1391

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/147323000803600628

关键词

GLUTAMINE DIPEPTIDE; ACUTE MYELOID LEUKAEMIA; NEUTROPHIL; PHAGOCYTOSIS; SUPEROXIDE ANION GENERATION; MUCOSITIS

资金

  1. Mahidol University
  2. Cerebos Awards

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of parenteral glutamine dipeptide (Gln) supplementation on neutrophil phagocytosis, superoxide anion generation (SAG), prevention of chemotherapy-induced side-effects and cost-effectiveness was examined in a pilot study of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients receiving chemotherapy. Sixteen AML patients were randomized to receive intravenous supplementation with Gln (30 g/day) or an equivalent quantity (25 g/day) of a standard amino acid mixture (control) on days 1 - 5 of chemotherapy. Complete blood count was evaluated twice a week until hospital discharge, and neutrophil phagocytosis and SAG were measured when absolute neutrophil count reached > 500 /mu l. Patients were observed for development of infection, mucositis and diarrhoea. In Gln-treated patients, the percentage of neutrophil phagocytosis and the SAG levels were significantly higher than in control patients (20.5 +/- 6.0% and 18.9 +/- 2.9 nmol/10(6) neutrophils per 10 min, respectively). The Gln-treated patients lost significantly less weight, tended to have shorter in-patient duration and had less severe oral mucositis than controls. This pilot study provides preliminary indication that parenteral Gln supplementation enhances neutrophil phagocytic function, maintains nutritional status and is cost effective. Parenteral Gln may also prevent oral mucositis, although further studies involving more patients need to be undertaken to confirm this and the other results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据