4.7 Article

Osteoprotegerin concentrations and prognosis in acute ischaemic stroke

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 267, 期 4, 页码 410-417

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2009.02163.x

关键词

stroke

资金

  1. Danish Heart Foundation
  2. Danish Heart Foundation, Copenhagen
  3. Balson Scholar Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Jensen JK, Ueland T, Atar D, Gullestad L, Mickley H, Aukrust P, Januzzi JL (Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Massachusetts General Hospital, USA). Osteoprotegerin concentrations and prognosis in acute ischaemic stroke. J Intern Med 2010; 267: 410-417. Aim. Concentrations of osteoprotegerin (OPG) have been associated with the presence of vascular and cardiovascular diseases, but the knowledge of this marker in the setting of ischaemic stroke is limited. Methods and results. In 244 patients with acute ischaemic stroke (age: 69 +/- 13 years), samples of OPG were obtained serially from presentation to day 5. Patients with overt ischaemic heart disease and atrial fibrillation were excluded. The patients were followed for 47 months, with all-cause mortality as the sole end-point. Multivariable predictors of OPG values at presentation included haemoglobin (T = -2.82; P = 0.005), creatinine (T = 4.56; P < 0.001), age (T = 9.66; P < 0.001), active smoking (T = 2.25; P = 0.025) and pulse rate (T = 3.23; P = 0.001). At follow-up 72 patients (29%) had died. Patients with OPG < 2945 pg mL-1 at baseline had a significantly improved survival rate on univariate analysis (P < 0.0001); other time-points did not add further prognostic information. In multivariate analysis, after adjustment for age, stroke severity, C-reactive protein levels, troponin T levels, heart and renal failure concentrations of OPG independently predicted long-term mortality after stroke (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% CI: 1.1 to 4.9; P = 0.024). Conclusion. Osteoprotegerin concentrations measured at admission of acute ischaemic stroke are associated with long-term mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据