4.5 Article

Increased risk of coronary heart disease in patients with hip fracture: a nationwide cohort study

期刊

OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 1849-1855

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-015-3097-y

关键词

Cohort study; Coronaryheartdisease (CHD); Hip fracture

资金

  1. Clinical Trial and Research Center of Excellence, Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare [MOHW103-TDU-B-212-113002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ASummary The study indicates that hip fracture is independently associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease. In addition, the highest risk of coronary heart disease following hip fracture appeared within the first year after hip fracture, indicating the need for multidisciplinary care for the patients. Introduction Bone and vasculature are modulated through numerous common pathways. However, data on the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) after hip fracture are scarce. Therefore, we investigated whether hip fracture increased the risk of CHD by conducting a large nationwide cohort study. Methods Using universal insurance claims data from 2000 to 2010, we identified a study cohort of 6013 participants newly diagnosed with hip fracture and a control cohort of 23,802 participants. Both cohorts were followed up to the end of 2011 to evaluate the risk of CHD. Results The overall incidence of CHD was 1.69-fold higher in the hip fracture cohort than it was in the control cohort (29.2 vs. 17.1 per 1000 person-years) with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.51 (95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.39-1.65). Sex-, age-, and comorbidity-specific analyses showed a higher relative risk of CHD for both women and men, all age groups, those with and without comorbidities, and patients with hip fracture compared with the control cohort. The highest risk of CHD was within the first year after hip fracture (adjusted HR = 1.72, 95 % CI = 1.45-2.04), and the risk remained high in the following years. Conclusion Hip fracture was independently associated with a subsequent risk of CHD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据