4.5 Article

Diapause Response of the Boll Weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to Feeding Period Duration and Cotton Square Size

期刊

JOURNAL OF INSECT SCIENCE
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/iey084

关键词

flower-bud size; dormancy; temperature; cotton; host-free survival

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Distribution of the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis grandis Boheman (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in the United States has been greatly reduced by eradication efforts. Still, it remains a key pest of cotton (Gossypium spp., [Malvales: Malvaceae]) in the New World, and has proven difficult to eliminate from Mexico and from southern Texas. In those regions, improved knowledge of boll weevil overwintering ecology may benefit efforts by eradication and management programs. Adult diapause in the boll weevil is well documented, but influences of the feeding period duration between adult eclosion and assessment of diapause remain unstudied. We examined diapause incidence and associated survival for weevils fed for 7, 14, or 21 d after adult eclosion. Diapause incidence of females was less influenced by feeding duration compared with males. For males, highest diapause incidence occurred after 14 d of feeding compared with 7 or 21 d. Host-free survival tended to be higher after 14 d of feeding compared with 7 or 21 d, although many weevils were long-lived (>= 80 d) after each feeding period duration. Males exhibited higher survival compared with females, and survival was higher for weevils fed large flower buds (squares) compared with smaller squares. Survival was most influenced by temperature; longevity increased with decreasing temperature except at the lowest temperature (12.8 degrees C). These results suggest an optimal feeding period for induction of diapause and maximized host-free longevity. These findings may permit improved timing of late-season insecticide treatments aimed at reducing overwintering populations, and thereby improve effectiveness of eradication and management programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据