4.1 Article

Comparison of Searching Behaviour of Two Aphelinid Parasitoids of the Greenhouse Whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum under Summer vs. Winter Conditions in a Temperate Climate

期刊

JOURNAL OF INSECT BEHAVIOR
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 134-147

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10905-008-9160-1

关键词

Trialeurodes vaporariorum; Encarsia formosa; Eretmocerus eremicus; searching behaviour; season; parasitoid; light; temperature

资金

  1. NSERC Biocontrol Network
  2. Ontario Greenhouse Vegetable Growers
  3. Matching Investment Initiative of Agriculture and Agri- Food Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Searching behaviour of two aphelinid parasitoids, Encarsia formosa Gahan and Eretmocerus eremicus Rose and Zolnerowich, was compared in a controlled environment under simulated summer [high light intensity (83 +/- 1 W/m(2)), and 24 +/- 1A degrees C] and winter [low light intensity (11 A +/- 0.5 W/m(2)), and 20 A +/- 1A degrees C] greenhouse conditions on tomato leaflets, with and without a single 3rd instar whitefly host, Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood), within a 4-cm tomato leaflet arena. Residence time of both parasitoid species was longer on infested leaflets vs. clean leaflets, and longer under winter than summer conditions. When parasitoids encountered a host on infested leaflets, residence time increased. In all cases, residence time of E. formosa was longer that of E. eremicus. Proportion of time spent searching (i.e. antennating leaf surface while walking or standing still) was longer on clean vs. infested leaflets for both E. formosa and E. eremicus. Walking speed by E. eremicus on clean leaflets was faster than E. formosa under both summer and winter conditions. Host handling time and proportion of host acceptance did not vary among parasitoids. These findings suggest that E. eremicus could be more efficient in host finding on tomato leaflets than E. formosa over all seasons, especially in the winter when natural light is limiting and where daylight temperatures are a parts per thousand yen20A degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据