4.6 Article

Preparation of new half sandwich ruthenium arene complexes with aminophosphines as potential chemotherapeutics

期刊

JOURNAL OF INORGANIC BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 171-188

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2012.07.022

关键词

Ruthenium(II) arene complexes; Aminophosphines; Anticancer drugs; Cytotoxicity; Metal-based drugs; DNA interaction

资金

  1. MINECO of Spain [CTQ-2011-24434]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aminophosphines 2-(diphenylphosphino)-1-methylimidazole (dpim) and diphenyl-2-pyridylphosphine (PPh(2)py) have been used to prepare two series of Ru(II) arene complexes of formulae [(eta(6)-p-cymene) Ru(kappa(2)-O,O'-X)(kappa(1)-P-dpim)]Y (series a: 1a.Y-3a.Y) and [(eta(6)-p-cymene)Ru(kappa(2)-O,O'-X)(kappa(1)-P-PPh(2)py)]Y (series b: 1b.Y-3b.Y) (where X=acac, acetylacetonate; bzac, benzoyl acetonate; dbzm, dibenzoyl methanoate; Y=BF4, BPh4). The structures of 1a.BF4, 1a.BPh4, 3a.BF4, 1b.BPh4 and 3b.BPh4 were determined by X-ray diffraction. The tetrafluoroborate derivatives are more soluble in organic solvents than their tetraphenylborate counterparts. Five BF4- derivatives (all except the unstable 1b.BF4) were selected to evaluate the cytotoxic behavior in vitro against the human cancer cell lines MCF-7 (breast cancer) and CAPAN-1 (pancreatic cancer). 2b.BF4 and 3b.BF4 exhibited IC50 values similar to those of cisplatin. Electrophoresis and AFM studies showed good correspondence between the biological activity levels of 2b.BF4 and 3b.BF4 and their ability to modify the DNA structure. Hydrolytic studies indicate that aquation could be involved in the activation mechanism of these complexes and confirm that the hydrolysis rate of 3b.BF4 is higher than that of 3a.BF4. Thus, the cytotoxic activity trends are explained in terms of the higher reactivity of derivatives from series b, which in turn is rationalized as being the result of the electronic features of dpim and PPh(2)py established by cyclic voltammetry measurements. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据