4.6 Article

Proteolytic processing of polyphenol oxidase from plants and fungi

期刊

JOURNAL OF INORGANIC BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 102, 期 12, 页码 2160-2170

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2008.08.007

关键词

Tyrosinase; Polyphenol oxidase; Catechol oxidase; Proteolysis; Molecular mass

资金

  1. Department of Chemistry
  2. College of Arts and Sciences of Indiana State University.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyphenol oxidase (PPO), a metalloenzyme containing a type-3 copper center, is produced by many species of plants, fungi, and bacteria. There is great variability in the subunit molecular mass reported for PPO, even from a single species. In some cases, experimental evidence (usually protein sequencing by Edman degradation) indicates that the variability in molecular mass for PPO from a given species is the result of proteolytic processing at the N and/or C-termini of the protein. In order to identify specific sequence regions where proteolysis occurs in PPO from most species, the experimentally established N and C-termini of these proteolyzed enzymes were compared to the protein sequences of other PPOs for which the N and C-termini have not been established by protein sequencing methods. In all cases the N-terminal proteolysis sites were located prior to a conserved arginine residue, and the C-terminal proteolysis sites were located following a conserved tyrosine motif. Based on the sites of proteolysis, molecular masses were calculated for the enzymes, and the calculated values were used to rationalize the varying molecular masses reported in the literature. To determine the structural implications of N and C-terminal proteolysis, the proteolysis sites were related to the two available PPO structures: lpo-moea batatas catechol oxidase and Streptomyces castaneoglobisporus tyrosinase. A structural core region that appears to be essential for structural stability and enzymatic activity was identified. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据