4.7 Article

Tropheryma whipplei Glycosylation in the Pathophysiologic Profile of Whipple's Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 199, 期 7, 页码 1043-1052

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/597277

关键词

-

资金

  1. Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique
  2. European Commission [QL G1-CT-2002-01049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Tropheryma whipplei is a bacterium commonly found in people with Whipple's disease, a rare systemic chronic infection. In the present study, we hypothesized that bacterium glycosylation may impair the immune response. Methods. Bacterial extracts were analyzed by glycostaining, and reactive proteins, identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectometry, were purified to generate antibodies that could be used in immunofluorescence studies. The reactivity of serum samples obtained from patients and asymptomatic carriers was tested against native or deglycosylated bacteria, for which the fate in macrophages was also investigated. Results. To our knowledge, we evidenced, for the first time in T. whipplei, a 110-kDa glycoprotein containing sialic acid. This protein, identified as an Wnt1-inducible signaling pathway (WiSP) protein, is associated with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining in infected intramacrophage biofilm. Consistent with the lack of enzymes required for the glycosylation pathway in this bacterium, the glycoproteins disappear during in vitro axenic subcultures, whereas human transcriptome analysis reveals the up-regulation of corresponding genes within infected macrophages. Proteic antigens are not recognized by the serum samples obtained from patients compared with those obtained from nonsick carriers, and T. whipplei that exhibits a low glycosylation profile does not efficiently multiply in macrophages in vitro. Conclusions. T. whipplei glycosylation is likely to impair antibody-mediated immune recognition in patients. Such an intracellular antigen masking system in bacteria has not previously been described.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据