4.7 Article

Pattern of Accessory Regions and Invasive Disease Potential in Streptococcus pneumoniae

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 199, 期 7, 页码 1032-1042

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/597205

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Torsten and Ragnar Soderbergs Foundation
  3. Swedish Royal Academy of Sciences
  4. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  5. European Union [LSHM-CT-2003-503413]
  6. EUROpathogenomics and Genomics [LSHM-CT-2005-518226]
  7. Sixth Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The invasive disease potential (IDP) of Streptococcus pneumoniae differs between serotypes, but the reason for this is unknown. Methods. A total of 47 pneumococcal isolates from 13 serotypes with different IDPs in humans that belonged to 37 multilocus sequence types were compared by whole genome microarrays and mutant analyses. Results. Approximately 34% of the genes were variable, including 95 genes previously shown by signature-tagged mutagenesis (STM) to be required for invasive disease in mice. Many variable genes were localized to 41 accessory regions (ARs), of which 24 contained genes previously identified by STM as required for invasive disease. Only AR6 and AR34 were preferentially found in isolates of serotypes with high IDPs. Neither AR6, which carries a gene previously identified by STM as required for invasive disease and encodes a 6-phospho-beta glucosidase, nor the putative adhesin expressed by AR34 was required for mouse virulence in TIGR4. Conclusions. Pneumococci possess a repertoire of ARs that differ between clones and even between isolates of the same clone. The ARs required for invasive disease in humans may be redundant, as no unique pattern distinguished the most invasive clones from others. The ARs that contained genes previously identified by STM as required for virulence in mice were frequently absent from invasive human isolates. Only 1 AR (AR6) was present in almost all isolates from the serotypes with the highest IDP (1, 4, and 7F), whereas it was missing from many others.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据