4.7 Article

Cellular Immune Responses during High-Dose Interferon-α Induction Therapy for Hepatitis C Virus Infection

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 199, 期 6, 页码 819-828

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/597072

关键词

-

资金

  1. UK Medical Research Council
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. James Martin 21st Century School, Oxford University
  4. NIHR Biomedical Research Programme
  5. MRC [G108/601] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [G108/601] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The effect that high-dose interferon (IFN)-alpha induction therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has on cellular immune responses is currently unknown. Methods. Thirty-one treatment-naive patients with chronic HCV infection received amantadine and ribavirin, combined with 6 weeks of high-dose IFN-alpha-2b induction therapy followed by weekly pegylated IFN-alpha-2b, for 24 or 48 weeks. Using IFN-gamma and interleukin (IL)-2 enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assays, we analyzed the pattern of cytokine secretion by structural and nonstructural HCV- and cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T cells before, during, and after therapy. Results. HCV-specific T cell responses, which were predominantly IFN-gamma secreting and which correlated with alanine transaminase levels (r(2) = 0.45; P = .001), were found before treatment in 10 of 15 patients with a sustained virological response (SVR) and in 11 of 16 in the non-SVR group. There was a striking loss of IFN-gamma and IL-2 HCV-specific T cells during therapy, predominantly in the SVR group. This response recovered after cessation of therapy, regardless of outcome. Suppression of CMV-specific T cell responses, in addition to total lymphocyte counts, was also observed. Conclusions. High-dose IFN-alpha induction therapy leads to a profound decline in IL-2-and IFN-gamma-secreting HCV-and CMV-specific T cells. These data indicate that restoration of T cell responses is unlikely to be causally linked to an early response or SVR to therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据