4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Adenosine Triphosphate Depletion of Erythrocytes Simulates the Phenotype Associated with Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency and Confers Protection against Plasmodium falciparum In Vitro

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 200, 期 8, 页码 1289-1299

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/605843

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Erythrocytes from individuals with pyruvate kinase deficiency (PKD) are resistant to invasion by Plasmodium falciparum parasites, and erythrocytes infected with ring-stage parasites are preferentially cleared by macrophages in vitro. However, the underlying molecular basis of protection is unknown. In the present study, we examined adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels in PKD erythrocytes (ie, erythrocytes from individuals with PKD) and determined whether depletion of ATP in normal erythrocytes would recapitulate the phenotype observed with PKD. Methods. We examined ATP levels in homozygous PKLR-/- and heterozygous PKLR+/- human erythrocytes and used sodium fluoride treatment to inhibit ATP generation in normal human erythrocytes. Results. We demonstrated that ATP levels are reduced in PKLR-/- (percentage of control erythrocytes, 26%; interquartile range [IQR], 21%-48%) and PKLR+/- erythrocytes (percentage of control erythrocytes, 64%; IQR, 60%-73%) and that there is a correlation between ATP levels in erythrocytes and both inhibition of parasite invasion and enhancement of phagocytosis of erythrocytes infected with ring-stage parasites. Analysis of ATP distribution in parasitized erythrocytes demonstrated that parasites invading PKD erythrocytes respond to low intraerythrocytic ATP levels by means of a parallel increase in parasite-derived ATP via up-regulation of P. falciparum-specific pyruvate kinase. Conclusion. These data suggest that reduced erythrocyte ATP levels may contribute to the protection displayed by PKD erythrocytes in vitro and may provide a model system with which to define the molecular basis of protection in inherited PKD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据