4.2 Article

Nationwide surveillance of the antimicrobial susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae from male urethritis in Japan

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 571-578

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1007/s10156-013-0637-2

关键词

Neisseria gonorrhoeae; Nationwide surveillance; Antimicrobial susceptibilities; Japan

资金

  1. Kyorin Pharmaceutical
  2. Shionogi Co. Ltd.
  3. Taisho Pharmaceutical
  4. Toyama Chemical
  5. Daiichi-Sankyo
  6. Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma
  7. Taiho Pharma
  8. Meiji Seika Pharma
  9. Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neisseria gonorrhoeae is one of the most important pathogens causing sexually transmitted infection, and strains that are resistant to several antimicrobials are increasing. To investigate the trends of antimicrobial susceptibility among N. gonorrhoeae strains isolated from male patients with urethritis, a Japanese surveillance committee conducted the first nationwide surveillance. The urethral discharge was collected from male patients with urethritis at 51 medical facilities from April 2009 to October 2010. Of the 156 specimens, 83 N. gonorrhoeae strains were tested for susceptibility to 18 antimicrobial agents. The prevalence of beta-lactamase-producing strains and chromosomally mediated resistant strains were 7.2 % and 16.5 %, respectively. None of the strains was resistant to ceftriaxone, but the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of ceftriaxone for 7 strains (8.4 %) was 0.125 mu g/ml. One strain was resistant to cefixime (MIC 0.5 mu g/ml). The MICs of fluoroquinolones, such as ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and tosufloxacin, showed a bimodal distribution. The MIC of sitafloxacin was lower than those of the three fluoroquinolones listed here, and it was found that the antimicrobial activity of sitafloxacin was stronger than that of the fluoroquinolones. The MIC of azithromycin in 2 strains was 2 mu g/ml, but no high-level resistance to macrolides was detected.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据