4.7 Article

Six weeks of antibiotic treatment is sufficient following surgery for septic arthroplasty

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
卷 61, 期 2, 页码 125-132

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2010.05.005

关键词

Oral antibiotic; Duration; Prosthetic joint; Infection; Surgery

资金

  1. Orthopaedic Service
  2. Laboratory of Bacteriology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: In the treatment of prosthetic joint infections (PJI), the benefit of antibiotic therapy for more than 6 weeks after surgery is uncertain. We compared PJI cure rates according to the duration of antibiotics, 6 versus 12 weeks. Methods: A prospective observational non-randomized study in Geneva University Hospitals 1996-2007. Results: A total of 144 PJI (62 hip arthroplasties, 62 knee arthroplasties, and 20 hip hemiarthroplasties) were included with a prolonged follow-up ranging from 26 to 65 months. Surgical treatment included 60 debridements with implant retention, 10 one-stage exchanges of the prosthesis, 57 two-stage exchanges, and 17 Girdlestone procedures or knee arthrodeses. Seventy episodes (49%) received 6 weeks antibiotic therapy and 74 episodes, 12 weeks. Cure was achieved in 115 episodes (80%). Cure rate did not change according to the duration of intravenous antibiotics (> 8 days, 8-21 days, > 21 days) (Kruskal-Wallis-test; p = 0.37). In multivariate analysis, none of the following parameters was statistically significantly associated with cure: two-stage exchange (odds ratio 1.1,95% CI 0.2-4.8); number of debridements (0.9, 0.4-1.9); six weeks antibiotherapy (2.7, 0.96-8.3); duration of intravenous course (1.0, 0.96-1.03); sinus tract (0.6, 0.2-1.7); or MRSA infection (0.5, 0.2-1.5), although implant retention showed a tendency for less cure (0.3, 0.1-1.1). Conclusions: Following surgery for treatment of PJI, antibiotic therapy appears able to be limited to a 6-week course, with one week of intravenous administration. This approach needs confirmation in randomized trials. (C) 2010 The British Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据