4.7 Article

A comparative study on the performance of different advanced oxidation processes (UV/O3/H2O2) treating linear alkyl benzene (LAB) production plant's wastewater

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2013.07.031

关键词

LAB industrial wastewater; Advanced oxidation process (AOP); COD removal efficiency; BOD5/COD; Response surface methodology (RSM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A detailed investigation on photooxidation of linear alkyl benzene (LAB) industrial wastewater is presented in this study. The process analysis was performed by varying four significant independent variables including two numerical factors (initial pH (3-11) and initial H2O2 concentration (0-20 mM)) and two categorical factors (UV irradiation and ozonation). The experiments were conducted based on a central composite design (CCD) and analyzed using response surface methodology (RSM). To assess the process performance, two parameters viz. TCOD removal efficiency and BOD5/COD were measured throughout the experiments. A maximum reduction in TCOD was 58, 53, 51, and 49%, respectively for UV/H2O2/O-3, H2O2/O-3, UV/O-3 and UV/H2O2 processes at the optimum conditions (initial pH of 7, initial H2O2 concentration of 100 mM, and reaction time of 180 min). A considerable increase in BOD5/COD ratio was obtained in the combined processes (0.46, 0.51, 0.53, and 0.55 for UV/H2O2, UV/O-3, H2O2/O-3 and UV/H2O2/O-3, respectively) compared to the single oxidant process (0.35). The results showed that mineralization of the LAB industrial wastewater in neutral pH is more favored than in acidic and basic pH. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) was applied to show the fate of organic compounds. In conclusion, the photooxidation process (UV/H2O2/O-3, H2O2/O-3, UV/O-3 and UV/H2O2) could be an appropriate pretreatment method prior to a biological treatment process. (C) 2013 The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据