4.6 Article

The Survival of Memory CD8 T Cells That Is Mediated by IL-15 Correlates with Sustained Protection Against Malaria

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 190, 期 10, 页码 5128-5141

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1203396

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI 46438]
  2. U.S. Army Materiel Command

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ag-specific memory T cell responses elicited by infections or vaccinations are inextricably linked to long-lasting protective immunity. Studies of protective immunity among residents of malaria endemic areas indicate that memory responses to Plasmodium Ags are not adequately developed or maintained, as people who survive episodes of childhood malaria are still vulnerable to either persistent or intermittent malaria infections. In contrast, multiple exposures to radiation-attenuated Plasmodium berghei sporozoites (Pb gamma-spz) induce long-lasting protective immunity to experimental sporozoite challenge. We previously demonstrated that sterile protection induced by Pb gamma-spz is MHC class I-dependent and CD8 T cells are the key effectors. IFN-gamma(+) CD8 T cells that arise in Pb gamma-spz-immunized B6 mice are found predominantly in the liver and are sensitive to levels of liver-stage Ag depot and they express CD44(hi)CD62L(lo) markers indicative of effector/effector memory phenotype. The developmentally related central memory CD8 T (T-CM) cells express elevated levels of CD122 (IL-15R beta), which suggests that CD8 T-CM cells depend on IL-15 for maintenance. Using IL-15-deficient mice, we demonstrate in this study that although protective immunity is inducible in these mice, protection is short-lived, mainly owing to the inability of CD8 T-CM cells to survive in the IL-15-deficient milieu. We present a hypothesis consistent with a model whereby intrahepatic CD8 T-CM cells, being maintained by IL-15-mediated survival and basal proliferation, are conscripted into the CD8 effector/effector memory T cell pool during subsequent infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据