4.6 Article

Activation-Induced Cytidine Deaminase-Initiated Off-Target DNA Breaks Are Detected and Resolved during S Phase

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 189, 期 5, 页码 2374-2382

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200414

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 CA138646, P20RR018789, P30 CA034196]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) initiates DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the IgH gene (Igh) to stimulate isotype class switch recombination (CSR), and widespread breaks in non-Igh (off-target) loci throughout the genome. Because the DSBs that initiate class switching occur during the G(1) phase of the cell cycle, and are repaired via end joining, CSR is considered a predominantly G(1) reaction. By contrast, AID-induced non-Igh DSBs are repaired by homologous recombination. Although little is known about the connection between the cell cycle and either induction or resolution of AID-mediated non-Igh DSBs, their repair by homologous recombination implicates post-G(1) phases. Coordination of DNA breakage and repair during the cell cycle is critical to promote normal class switching and prevent genomic instability. To understand how AID-mediated events are regulated through the cell cycle, we have investigated G(1)-to-S control in AID-dependent genome-wide DSBs. We find that AID-mediated off-target DSBs, like those induced in the Igh locus, are generated during G(1). These data suggest that AID-mediated DSBs can evade G(1)/S checkpoint activation and persist beyond G(1), becoming resolved during S phase. Interestingly, DSB resolution during S phase can promote not only non-Igh break repair, but also Ig CSR. Our results reveal novel cell cycle dynamics in response to AID-initiated DSBs, and suggest that the regulation of the repair of these DSBs through the cell cycle may ensure proper class switching while preventing AID-induced genomic instability. The Journal of Immunology, 2012, 189: 2374-2382.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据