4.6 Article

Enhanced Antigen Processing of Flagellin Fusion Proteins Promotes the Antigen-Specific CD8+ T Cell Response Independently of TLR5 and MyD88

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 186, 期 11, 页码 6255-6262

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001855

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [P01 AI 60642]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flagellin is a highly effective adjuvant for CD4(+) T cell and humoral immune responses. However, there is conflicting data in the literature regarding the ability of flagellin to promote a CD8(+) T cell response. In this article, we report that immunization of wildtype, TLR5(-/-), and MyD88(-/-) adoptive transfer recipient mice revealed the ability of flagellin fusion proteins to promote OVA-specific CD8(+) T cell proliferation independent of TLR5 or MyD88 expression by the recipient animal. Wild-type and TLR5(-/-) APCs were able to stimulate high levels of OVA-specific CD8(+) T cell proliferation in vitro in response to a flagellin fusion protein containing full-length OVA or the SIINFEKL epitope and 10 flanking amino acids (OVAe), but not to OVA and flagellin added as separate proteins. This effect was independent of the conserved regions of flagellin and occurred in response to OVAe alone. Comparison of IFN-gamma production by CD8(+) effector cells revealed higher levels of SIINFEKL peptide-MHC I complexes on the surface of APCs that had been pulsed with OVAe-flagellin fusion proteins than on cells pulsed with OVA. Inhibition of the proteasome significantly reduced Ag-specific proliferation in response to OVAe fusion proteins. In summary, our data are consistent with the conclusion that flagellin-OVA fusion proteins induce an epitope-specific CD8(+) T cell response by facilitating Ag processing and not through stimulatory signaling via TLR5 and MyD88. Our findings raise the possibility that flagellin might be an efficient Ag carrier for Ags that are poorly processed in their native state. The Journal of Immunology, 2011, 186: 6255-6262.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据