4.6 Article

NK Cell Adoptive Transfer Combined with Ontak-Mediated Regulatory T Cell Elimination Induces Effective Adaptive Antitumor Immune Responses

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 186, 期 6, 页码 3327-3335

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000652

关键词

-

资金

  1. Eisai Co., Ltd. [ONT-IIS-0018-07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous work from our laboratory showed that hydrocortisone (HC) combined with IL-15 induces expansion of activated human NK cells. We set up an experimental tumor model to evaluate the use of adoptively transferred, HC plus IL-15 (HC/IL-15)-activated and -expanded murine NK cells in the treatment of syngeneic mice carrying established lung metastases of the CT26 transplantable tumor. We also examined the effect of denileukin diftitox (Ontak) on the depletion of regulatory T cells to enhance the in vivo antitumor immunity induced by the adoptively transferred NK cells. Our results clearly demonstrate that murine DX5(+) NK cells are largely expanded in the presence of IL-15 plus HC while retaining intact their functional status. Moreover, when intravenously infused, they mediated significant antitumor responses against CT26 lung tumors in syngeneic BALB/c animals that were further enhanced upon pretreatment of the tumor-bearing animals with Ontak. Total splenocytes and isolated splenic T cells from NK-treated mice responded in vitro against CT26 tumor cells as evidenced by IFN-gamma-based ELISPOT, proliferation, and cytotoxicity assays. Importantly, animals treated with Ontak plus adoptive transfer of HC/IL-15-expanded NK cells significantly retarded CT26 tumor growth after a rechallenge with the same tumor s.c. in their flanks. Taken altogether, our data suggest that NK cell adoptive transfer can trigger adaptive antitumor T cell responses, and regulatory T cell depletion by Ontak is mandatory for enabling HC/IL-15-activated NK cells to promote long-lasting adaptive antitumor immunity. The Journal of Immunology, 2011, 186: 3327-3335.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据