4.6 Article

Nonmalignant Clonal Expansions of Memory CD8+ T Cells That Arise with Age Vary in Their Capacity To Mount Recall Responses to Infection

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 185, 期 6, 页码 3456-3462

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001745

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AI67967, AI76499, AG21600, T32 AI49823, AI83610]
  2. Trudeau Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Immune responsiveness declines with age in part due to the development of CD8(+) T cell clonal expansions (TCEs) that can dominate the peripheral T cell pool. Although some TCEs arise due to persistent Ag stimulation from chronic infections, others arise in the apparent absence of chronic infection. We have recently shown that this latter class of TCEs can arise over time from the memory CD8(+) T cell pool established by an acute viral infection. Unlike TCEs driven by chronic infections, these age-related TCEs do not display the phenotypic and in vitro functional characteristics of exhausted cells. However, the rate at which these age-related TCEs develop from the memory CD8(+) T cell pool, as well as their ability to mount a recall response to secondary pathogen challenge in vivo, is not known. In this study, we analyzed large cohorts of mice over time for the development of TCE following Sendai virus infection and found a progressive increase in the appearance of TCEs, such that most mice showed evidence of TCE within the memory T cell pool by 2 y postinfection. Using a dual adoptive transfer approach to address the recall potential of virus-specific TCEs, we also demonstrate that most TCEs examined are poorly responsive to a secondary infection. Therefore, we provide evidence that the development of TCE is a common occurrence due to the progressive dysregulation of the virus-specific memory T cell pool with age, but many TCEs are profoundly defective in their ability to mediate recall responses. The Journal of Immunology, 2010, 185: 3456-3462.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据