4.6 Article

Protein Kinase B/Akt Signals Impair Th17 Differentiation and Support Natural Regulatory T Cell Function and Induced Regulatory T Cell Formation

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 183, 期 10, 页码 6124-6134

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900246

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [BO1054/2-1]
  2. Land Sachsen-Anhalt [N2/ND]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protein kinase B (PKB)/Akt signals control T cell proliferation and differentiation but their effect on the generation and function of regulatory T cells (Treg) and Th17 cells is not well understood. In this study, we show that elevated PKB signals antagonize the immunosuppressive effect of TGF-beta 1 on cell size, CD25 and CD98 expression, and proliferation of CD3-stimulated naive CD4(+) T cells from wild-type and CD28-deficient mice. Conventional CD4(+) T cells expressing active PKB are less susceptible to suppression by natural regulatory T cells. Although PKB signals do not affect the development of natural regulatory T cells, they enhance their suppressor capacity. Upon TCR triggering and TGF-beta 1 costimulation, wild-type and CD28-deficient CD4(+) T cells transgenic for PKB readily express Foxp3, thereby acquiring suppressor capacity. These effects of elevated PKB signals on T cell function involve a marked and sustained activation of STAT5 and Foxp3 and reduction in nuclear NFATc1 levels. In contrast, PKB signals impair TGF-beta 1/IL-6-mediated differentiation of naive CD4(+) T cells into the Th17 lineage. This correlates with an increased signaling of ERK, STAT5, and STAT6. Finally, elevated PKB signals reduced the severity of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in wild-type mice but induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice deficient for CD28. Altogether, these data indicate an important role of PKB signals on control of TGF-beta 1-mediated T cell responses and, thereby, on tolerizing and inflammatory immune processes. The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 183: 6124-6134.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据