4.6 Article

Jagged1 on Dendritic Cells and Notch on CD4+ T Cells Initiate Lung Allergic Responsiveness by Inducing IL-4 Production

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 183, 期 5, 页码 2995-3003

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900692

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL-36577, HL-61005, AI-77609]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20679005] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Jagged1, a Notch ligand, and Notch have been implicated in Th2 differentiation, but their role in initiating IL-4 production and Th2 differentiation in vivo and the development of allergic airway responses has not been defined. In this study, we show that Jagged1 is up-regulated on bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) pulsed with allergen and that the transfer of these BMDCs before allergen challenge induces airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and eosinophilic airway inflammation. Treatment of CD4(+) T cells with a gamma-secretase inhibitor (GSI), which inhibits Notch signaling, resulted in decreased cytokine production when the cells were cocultured with allergen-pulsed, Jagged1-expressing BMDCs and, after the transfer of allergen-pulsed BMDCs, IL-4-deficient (IL-4(-/-)) recipients of GSI-treated naive CD4(+) T cells developed lower levels of AHR, reduced numbers of eosinophils, and lower Th2 cytokine levels when challenged with allergen. In vivo treatment of wild-type mice with Jagged1-Fc enhanced AHR and airway inflammation, whereas the transfer of BMDC transfected with Jagged1 small interfering RNA (siRNA) cells into WT or IL-4(-/)- mice before transfer of CD4(+) T cells resulted in decreased AHR, inflammation, and Th2 cytokines, indicating the critical role for Jagged1 expression on APCs. These data identify the essential role of the interactions between Notch on CD4(+) T cells and Jaggedl on APCs in the initiation of IL-4 production and Th2 differentiation for the development of AHR and allergic airway inflammation. The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 183: 2995-3003.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据