4.6 Article

Fulminant Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus-Induced Inflammation of the CNS Involves a Cytokine-Chemokine-Cytokine-Chemokine Cascade

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 182, 期 2, 页码 1079-1087

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.182.2.1079

关键词

-

资金

  1. Danish Medical Research Council
  2. Lundbeck Foundation
  3. Novo Nordisk Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intracerebral inoculation of immunocompetent mice with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) normally results in fatal CD8(+) T cell mediated meningoencephalitis. However, in CXCL10-deficient mice, the virus-induced CD8(+) T cell accumulation in the neural parenchyma is impaired, and only 30-50% of the mice succumb to the infection. Similar results are obtained in mice deficient in the matching chemokine receptor, CXCR3. Together, these findings point to a key role for CXCL10 in regulating the severity of the LCMV-induced inflammatory process. For this reason, we now address the mechanisms regulating the expression of CXCL10 in the CNS of LCMV-infected mice. Using mice deficient in type I IFN receptor, type II IFN receptor, or type II IFN, as well as bone marrow chimeras expressing CXCL10 only in resident cells or only in bone marrow-derived cells, we analyzed the up-stream regulation as well as the cellular source of CXCL10. We found that expression of CXCL10 initially depends on signaling through the type I IYN receptor, while late expression and up-regulation requires type II IFN produced by the recruited CD8(+) T cells. Throughout the infection, the producers of CXCL10 are exclusively resident cells of the CNS, and astrocytes are the dominant expressors in the neural parenchyma, not microglial cells or recruited bone marrow-derived cell types. These results are consistent with a model suggesting a bidirectional interplay between resident cells of the CNS and the recruited virus-specific T cells with astrocytes as active participants in the local antiviral host response. The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 182: 1079-1087.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据