4.6 Article

FcεRI and FcγRIII/CD16 Differentially Regulate Atopic Dermatitis in Mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 182, 期 10, 页码 6517-6526

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0801055

关键词

-

资金

  1. Institute National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale
  2. Fondation pour la Recheeche Medicale (Nouveaux delis en Allagologic)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The high-affinity IgE receptor Fc epsilon RI and, in some models, the low-affinity IgG receptor Fc gamma RIII/CD16 play an essential role in allergic diseases. In human skin, they are present on APCs and effector cells recruited into the inflamed dermis. FcR gamma is a subunit shared, among other FcRs, by Fc epsilon RI and CD16 and is essential to their assembly and signal transduction. Using an experimental model reproducing some features of human atopic dermatitis and specific FcR-deficient mice, we have herein delineated the respective contribution of Fc epsilon RI and Fc gamma RIII/CD16 to the pathology. We demonstrate that symptoms of atopic dermatitis are completely absent in FcR gamma-deficient animals but only partially inhibited in either Fc epsilon RI- or Fc gamma RIII/CD16-deficient animals. Absence or attenuation of the pathology is correlated to increased skin expression of regulatory IL-10 and Foxp3. While Fc epsilon RI controls both Th1 and Th2 skin response, mast cell recruitment into draining lymph nodes and IgE production, CD16 regulates only Th2 skin response, as well as T cell proliferation and IgG I production. This isotype-specific regulation by the cognate FcR is associated to a differential regulation of IL-4 and IL-21 expression in the draining lymph nodes. Fc epsilon RI and CD16 thus contribute to atopic dermatitis but differentially regulate immune responses associated with the disease. Targeting both IgE/Fc epsilon RI and IgG/CD16 interactions might represent an efficient therapeutic strategy for allergic diseases. The Journal of Immunology, 2009, 182: 6517-6526.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据