4.6 Article

Villous B cells of the small intestine are specialized for invariant NK T cell dependence

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 180, 期 7, 页码 4629-4638

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.7.4629

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA016042, CA 016042] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [RR 018603, P40 RR018603] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL066436-04, R01 HL066436] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIAID NIH HHS [AI 058919, F31 AI058919] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK069434, DK 34987, DK 69434, P30 DK 349870, P30 DK034987, DK 46763, P01 DK046763] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM 07185, T32 GM007185] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

B cells are important in mucosal microbial homeostasis through their well-known role in secretory IgA production and their emerging role in mucosal immunoregulation. Several specialized intraintestinal B cell compartments have been characterized, but the nature of conventional B cells in the lamina propria is poorly understood. In this study, we identify a B cell population predominantly composed of surface IgM(+) IgD(+) cells residing in villi of the small intestine and superficial lamina propria of the large intestine, but distinct from the intraepithelial compartment or organized intestinal lymphoid structures. Small intestinal (villous) B cells are diminished in genotypes that alter the strength of BCR signaling (Bruton tyrosine kinase(xid), G alpha i2(-/-)), and in mice lacking cognate BCR specificity. They are not dependent on enteric microbial sensing, because they are abundant in mice that are germfree or genetically deficient in TLR signaling. However, villous B cells are reduced in the absence of invariant NK T cells (J alpha 18(-/-) or CD1d(-/-) mice). These findings define a distinct population of conventional B cells in small intestinal villi, and suggest an immunologic link between CD1-restricted invariant NK T cells and this B cell population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据