4.6 Article

Postnatal life events affect the severity of asthmatic airway inflammation in the adult rat

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 180, 期 6, 页码 3919-3925

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.6.3919

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetic and hygienic factors influence susceptibility to asthma. In autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, additional effects of the psychosocial environment have been demonstrated that might also play a role in asthma. In this study, the impact of different early postnatal stressors on an OVA-induced model of asthma was tested in adulthood. Fischer 344 rats were subjected to either repeated handling stimulation (HA), maternal separation (MS), or were left undisturbed in their first 4 wk of life. Behavioral differences were characterized at the age of 4 mo. At 5 mo of age, immunological cellular and serologic changes were investigated and experimental asthma was induced. Results show significantly increased exploratory behavior and reduced anxiety in HA rats compared with MS and controls. Without further behavioral or immunological challenges, HA animals exhibited an increased ex vivo NK cell cytotoxicity but no other obvious immunological differences. After induction of asthma, in contrast, MS animals exhibited proinflammatory effects in leukocyte subset composition including increased eosinophil numbers, whereas levels of IgE and the allergy-specific cytokine IL-13 were reduced compared with HA. There was a most remarkable increase of adrenocorticotropin in HA animals, comparing pre- to postchallenge plasma levels. These data demonstrate for the first time that early postnatal stimulative or adverse experiences exert long-lasting changes of the neuroendocrinoimmune interface in adulthood, resulting in either protective or aggravating mechanisms in allergic airway disease. Thus, in addition to genetic and hygienic factors, nongenetically acquired individual differences contribute to the pathobiology of asthma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据