4.2 Article

The use of IgG antibodies in conventional and non-conventional immunodiagnostic tests for early prognosis after treatment of Chagas disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS
卷 370, 期 1-2, 页码 24-34

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2011.05.003

关键词

Chagas disease; Trypanosoma cruzi; Treatment; Cure assessment; Serology; Flow cytometry

资金

  1. CPqRR/FIOCRUZ
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvi-mento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [475805/2003-8]
  3. UNICEF/UNDP/ World Bank/WHO
  4. Project Development Grant Committee [A30451]
  5. FAPEMIG [CDS-BPV-00052-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Treatment success of chronically infected Chagas disease patients is laborious and a positive prognosis often is made only after repetitive serological and/or parasitological examinations with continuous negative results. Recently, we have developed a non-conventional flow-cytometric method in order to detect immunoglobulin G antibodies against live trypomastigote forms of Trypanosoma cruzi and showed its usefulness in the prognosis of treatment success. In the present study, we investigated the performance of flow-cytometric anti-live trypomastigote IgG antibodies (FC-ALTA) and flow-cytometric anti-fixed epimastigote IgG antibodies (FC-AFEA), as well as conventional serological methods, for early monitoring of benznidazole treated Chagas disease patients, e.g. 5 years after treatment The analysis of individual FC-ALTA reactivity along the titration curve before and after treatment, we were able to show, that between 4% and 13% of treated patients under evaluation presented with reduced serological reactivity and segregated from the other patient groups. Similar results were obtained with semi-quantitative, conventional indirect hemagglutination or indirect immunofluorescence. Our data therefore suggest that the combined use of conventional and non-conventional serological methods could provide more suitable cure criteria in early post-therapeutic prognosis of Chagas disease. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据