4.2 Article

Comparative methodologies of regulatory T cell depletion in a murine melanoma model

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS
卷 333, 期 1-2, 页码 167-179

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2008.01.012

关键词

regulatory T cell; dendritic cell; melanoma; cyclophosphamide; denileukin diftitox; anti-CD25 antibody

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [K12 CA 87989, K12 CA087989, K12 CA087989-02] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There has been recent interest in the depletion of regulatory T cells (Tregs) as part of a multi-faceted approach to the immunotherapy of melanoma patients. This is in part due recent findings that convincingly show that Tregs are an integral part of regulating and even suppressing an immune response to growing tumor cells. We therefore compared three methods of Treg depletion and/or elimination, utilizing low dose cyclophosphamide (CY), a specific antibody directed against the IL-2 receptor found on Tregs (PC61) and the use of denileukin diftitox (1313), which is a fusion protein designed to have a direct cytocidal action on cells which express the IL-2 receptor. We show that CY administration resulted in the highest reduction in Tregs among the three reagents. However, the reduction in Tregs with CY was also associated with the concomitant reduction of CD8(+) T cells and a lack of tumor antigen priming. Utilization of DD resulted in a > 50% Treg cell reduction without parallel cytocidal effects upon other T cell subsets but did not enhance anti-tumor immunity against B 16 melanoma. Lastly, the PC61 showed a moderate reduction of Tregs that lasted longer than the other reagents, without a reduction in the total number of CD8(+) T cells. Furthermore, PC61 treatment did not abrogate tumor antigen-specific immunity elicited by dendritic cells (DC). We therefore conclude that PC61 administration was the most effective method of reducing Tregs in a murine melanoma model in addition to providing evidence of a synergistic effect when combined with DC-based immunotherapy. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据