4.7 Article

Multi-variable calibration of a semi-distributed hydrological model using streamflow data and satellite-based evapotranspiration

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 505, 期 -, 页码 276-290

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.006

关键词

Actual evapotranspiration; SEBS; Karkheh; Iran; Hydrological modeling

资金

  1. International Water Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, Sri Lanka
  2. Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation of the University of Twente, the Netherlands
  3. CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food (CPWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, streamflow (Q(s)) and satellite-based actual evapotranspiration (ETa) are used in a multi-variable calibration framework to reproduce the catchment water balance. The application is for the HBV rainfall-runoff model at daily time-step for the Karkheh River Basin (51,000 km(2)) in Iran. Monte Carlo Simulation serves to estimate parameter values and to assess uncertainty for three calibration cases. In case one streamflow is used as the calibration target. In case two satellite-based ETa is used as calibration target. For both cases model performance is evaluated for the second variable that closes the water balance. In case three a preference-based multi-variable objective function is applied which is weighted for Q(s) and satellite-based ETa. For cloudy days a procedure is developed to complete the daily time series of satellite-based ETa that cover 4 years. Results on multi-variable calibration indicated satisfying results for both water balance terms. Results are compared against field observations and results of single-variable calibration. For cases one and two the second variable only is poorly simulated and resulted in poor reproduction of the water balance. The most important contribution of this work is that the catchment water balance is best reproduced when both Q(s) and satellite-based ETa serve as calibration target. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据