4.7 Article

Water quality along a river continuum subject to point and diffuse sources

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
卷 350, 期 3-4, 页码 154-165

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.10.034

关键词

AMP4; canal; Kennet; phosphate; river; sewage

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh010022] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The water quality along the River Kennet, in the Thames basin of southern England, was examined in terms of the influence of point- and diffuse-nutrient inputs. The river is supplied mainly from a Cretaceous Chalk aquifer and hence the waters are of a calcium bicarbonate type. The nitrate largely comes from agricultural sources, with concentrations decreasing downstream due to plant uptake and probable denitrification. In contrast, soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) is largely associated with sewage inputs and concentrations increase downstream in tine with effluents from major towns such as Newbury and Reading. Adjacent to the river in the lower half of the catchment is the Kennet and Avon Canal and the two are in places hydrologically connected. The canal inputs may influence calcium carbonate (calcite) precipitation and increase suspended sediment and particulate phosphorus concentrations in the river. Monitoring upstream and downstream of Marlborough sewage treatment works (STW) showed that SRP concentrations in the effluent were highly variable due to variable efficiency of P stripping and still sufficiently concentrated to dominate downstream river SRP with potential impacts on stream ecology. Biological recovery in this river following P stripping at STWs is complex and controlling those spikes in SRP that are above a threshold of 100 mu g l(-1) may be a critical requirement. More stringent effluent targets than are currently recommended may be needed (less than 800 mu g RP l(-1)) to achieve good ecological status in this river depending on SRP concentrations upstream. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据