4.2 Article

Fetal sex and the circulating renin-angiotensin system during early gestation in women who later develop preeclampsia or gestational hypertension

期刊

JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 133-139

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2013.51

关键词

angiotensin II; angiotensin-(1-7); preeclampsia; gestational hypertension; prorenin; angiotensin-converting enzyme

资金

  1. Premier's Science and Research Fund, Government of South Australia
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council Australia (NHMRC) [565320]
  3. University of Adelaide
  4. NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship [APP1020749]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There are fetal sex-specific differences in the balance between angiotensin (Ang) II and Ang-(1-7) in the maternal circulation during pregnancy. To determine whether at 15 weeks' gestation plasma levels of Ang II and Ang-(1-7), as well as levels of prorenin and Ang-converting enzyme (ACE), predicted the development of gestational hypertension (GH) or preeclampsia (PreE) and were associated with estimates of fetal and maternal health, women who later developed GH (n = 50) or PreE (n = 50) were compared with body mass index-matched controls (n = 100). Women who subsequently developed PreE or GH had increased Ang-(1-7) levels at 15 weeks' gestation compared with women with normal pregnancies. When separated by fetal sex, this difference was seen only in women carrying a female fetus. Prorenin and ACE concentrations were not useful biomarkers for the prediction of either PreE or GH at 15 weeks' gestation. Women with a male fetus who developed PreE and women who subsequently developed GH had increased blood pressures at 15 weeks' gestation compared with women with normal pregnancies, suggesting that these women were on an early trajectory for the development of hypertension. We propose that measurement of Ang-(1-7) during early gestation could be useful in predicting, those women who will go on to develop new-onset hypertension in pregnancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据