4.2 Article

Predictors of Clostridium difficile Infections in Hospitalized Children

期刊

JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE
卷 9, 期 2, 页码 94-98

出版社

FRONTLINE MEDICAL COMMUNICATIONS
DOI: 10.1002/jhm.2135

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDRecent studies report an increasing incidence of Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs) in children and suggest that CDIs may occur outside known populations at risk. OBJECTIVETo identify clinical factors associated with CDI in a hospitalized pediatric population. METHODSA retrospective case-control study was conducted with C difficile cases (CD) and controls (CTLs) in hospitalized children over a 2-year period. CDs (N = 134) and 2:1 age-matched CTLs (N = 274) with diarrheal illness were evaluated. RESULTSCDs and CTLs were similar in gender and race. Watery diarrhea was the most common type of diarrhea in CDs and CTLs. Immunodeficiency (46% vs 6%; P < 0.001), gastrointestinal (GI) disease (31% vs 18%; P = 0.005), and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use (22% vs 7%; P < 0.001) were more frequent in CDs. Of CDs, 30% were defined as community acquired. Bloody diarrhea was more frequent in community-acquired CD (28% vs 4% P < 0.001); however, other clinical variables were not statistically different. No antibiotic exposure, recent hospitalization, prolonged hospitalization, or past history of CDI existed in 8% of CDs. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that antibiotic use (odds ratio [OR]: 2.80, P = 0.001), recent hospitalization (OR: 2.33, P = 0.007), and immunodeficiency (OR: 6.02, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with cases when controlling for PPI use, having GI disease, and history of abdominal surgery. CONCLUSIONSClinical history is of greater value than symptoms in distinguishing CD, with immunodeficiency having the strongest association. An important percentage of CDs did not have any risk factors, confirming concerns that CDIs do occur in otherwise low-risk pediatric populations Journal of Hospital Medicine 2014;9:94-98. (c) 2013 Society of Hospital Medicine

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据