4.2 Article

Gastric Mucus Alterations Associated With Murine Helicobacter Infection

期刊

JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY
卷 57, 期 5, 页码 457-467

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1369/jhc.2009.952473

关键词

mucins; trefoil factors; adaptive immunity; Helicobacter; gastric adenocarcinoma; gastritis; immunofluorescence

资金

  1. American Cancer Society [RPG-99-086-01-MBC]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 DK-059911, P01 DK-071176]
  3. Molecular Pathology and Imaging Core of the University of Alabama at Birmingham Digestive Diseases Research Development Center [P30 DK064400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The C57BL/6 mouse has been shown to develop gastric adenocarcinoma after Helicobacter felis infection. This model was used to determine whether mucin and trefoil factor (TFF) expression after infection was altered in a similar fashion to the changes seen in the protective gastric mucus layer of the human stomach after H. pylori infection. Our results indicate that this mouse model mimics many of the changes seen after human H. pylori infection, including increased expression of muc4 and muc5b and loss of muc5ac. These alterations in mucin expression occurred as early as 4 weeks postinfection, before the development of significant mucous metaplasia or gastric dysplasia. The decrease in muc5ac expression occurred only in the body of the stomach and was not secondary to the adaptive immune response to infection, because a similar decrease in expression was seen after infection of B6.Rag-1(-/-) mice, which lack B and T cells. Intriguingly, the increased expression of Muc4 and Muc5b in infected C57BL/6 mice was not seen in the infected B6.Rag-1(-/-) mice. Because B6.Rag-1(-/-) mice do not develop gastric pathology after H. felis infection, these findings point to the potential role of Muc4 and Muc5b in disease progression. This manuscript contains online supplemental material at http://www.jhc.org. Please visit this article online to view these materials. (J Histochem Cytochem 57:457-467, 2009)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据